The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, allowing the appeal against a decision continuing a freezing injunction against the appellant granted in favour of the respondent provisional liquidator, held that the judge had erred by not keeping in mind the need for the respondent to justify a departure from the default position that an applicant for an interim freezing injunction had to give an unlimited cross-undertaking in damages.
Downloads
R3 members can provide advice on a range of business and personal finance issues. To find an R3 member who can help you, click below.