R3's Letter to the Editor of the Times on proposed changes to Companies House Records
03 August 2016
Sir,
Erasing the records of closed companies after only six years (Times, 2nd August) would be detrimental to fraud investigations. Insolvency practitioners investigate company directors and return money to creditors once a company enters insolvency. It can take time to uncover a director's fraudulent behaviour, and even longer to trace hidden assets.
It's not unusual for action to be taken against a dissolved company many years later. Fraudsters often dissolve their corporate vehicles in the hope that no one will pursue them.
There are already inadequate checks on directors registering companies, and it's not uncommon to discover directors that are involved in several companies which have gone out of business. While repeated company failures do not necessarily signal wrongdoing, it's very useful to have evidence of directors' track records.
Deleting records after such a short period of time will destroy evidence, hide past director behaviour and give fraudsters a clean slate.
Frances Coulson, Chair of the Fraud Group, R3 the insolvency and restructuring trade body
This letter can be viewed on the Times website here.
- R3 Blog Member news, commentary and analysis from R3
- Policy & Research Insights into the economy and the insolvency and restructuring, and recommendations for reform
- Consultation Responses Our responses to Government consultations on insolvency and restructuring issues
R3 members can provide advice on a range of business and personal finance issues. To find an R3 member who can help you, click below.